SPHM Infos
Appel à contributions, Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations Special issue 2012, "Diasporic Identities, Media, Public Space"
The Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations will launch a special issue
dedicated to the theme : ‘Diasporic Identities, Media, Public Space.’ This issue is scheduled to
appear in spring 2012.
Background
The special issue ‘Diasporic Identities, Media, Public Space’ will gather studies approaching
the diasporic phenomenon in relation to mediatization practices and the configuration of
public sphere. The issue seeks to explore various visibility patterns of diasporic identities and
any complementary theme is considered relevant as long as it allows insight into various
aspects of this approach.
Recent analyses on diaspora underline the importance the media, the internet and
communication technologies at large have in the formation and manifestation of transnational
communities (Tsagarousianou, R., 2004 ; Aksoy, A., Robins, K., 2000 ; Diminescu, D.,
Pasquier, D., 2010). Mass media and the internet redefine the imagery of distance and
proximity with the country of origin by integrating daily practices from that country in a ‘here
and now’ perspective. Recent studies discuss the migrant’s condition as an actor in multiple
communities, affiliation networks and public cultures. The concept of ‘diaspora’ is enriched
with a variety of readings in the context of globalization, transnational mobility and expansion
of new communication technologies (Brubaker, R., 2005). Diaspora signifies communities
and individuals who settle temporarily in a country of destination, whose mobility has
professional, economic or cultural reasons, who participate in a variety of ‘parallel and
competing networks’ (Giorgiou, M., 2006), many of which connected with the country of
origin.
The main questions around which this issue is built refer to the media construction of
migrant’s image and the highlight of emerging practices of diasporic identity manifestation :
are various forms of migration and, subsequently, various types of diasporic actors mediatized
as ‘distant’ phenomena (at best retrieved in a media-political agenda) or, on the contrary, do
the media put forward various nuanced images about the diasporic experience, by
approaching this theme as a public issue ? We are interested in analyses of the way national,
transnational, ethnic media cast light on diasporic practices and identities so that they become
relevant as public issues.
Transnational mobility influences the identitarian sensibility of the migrant ; it also contributes
to the development of cosmopolitan attitudes and practices in various daily interactions.
Individuals’ banal cosmopolitanism can in time trigger communitarian imagery that breaks
away from local cultural paradigms as individuals accept alternative modernization paths.
Therefore, how do the media build migrants’ ‘worlds’ ? In this perspective, it is highly
interesting to look into the mediation practices the media use to move from ‘narrations’ and
‘cases’ to the construction of a type of social actor – for instance, an actor with critical
competence, a party to various systems.
Furthermore, how is mediation built between diasporic actors and the national public,
respectively ‘us’ and ‘them’ ? L. Chouliaraki (2008) refers to the capacity of media discourse
to create cosmopolitan sensibility in the public, who reflect on the significance of the event,
rather than simply ascertain facts.
Special attention is given to the phenomenon of intra-EU migration (Balabanova, E., Balch,
A., 2010) or ‘the new diaspora’, a conventional term used in media discourse in postcommunist
countries to refer to the migration of the workforce, following the liberalization of
movement of labor in the EU. In these countries workforce migration has become a
permanent theme on the media and political agenda. The theme of Romanians abroad, for
instance, is constantly approached in the governmental and electoral political discourse,
legitimizing public policies and institutional reconfigurations. Consequently, ‘features’,
‘policies’ and ‘discourses’ appear - various ‘communication contracts’ and governing logics
in approaching the diasporic phenomenon. How is ‘moral distance’ from the diasporic
community symbolically negotiated depending on debate topics and strategic interests of
participants in the debate ? Are social actors of intra-EU migration ‘globally’ mediatized as an
emerging social category or do they gain visibility as distinct identities, social actors with
biographies, trajectories and distinctive reflexivity ?
Other research tracks are : the way in which mobility and workforce occupation policies at
European or national level are liable to become themes for public debate (through media or
institutional discourse) and the frames by means of which such themes are open to public
debate. How does the migrant’s experience become a reference point, a relevant case or an
argument invoked by various public actors in order to propose new themes on the public
agenda ? Do they start from the migrant’s case or, more generally, from the mobility
phenomenon, to discuss themes related to legal or institutional, local or European frameworks ?
How do the media reflect these debates ?
Topics may include, but are not limited to :
ï‚· Diasporic spaces, media representations, public issues ;
 Media discourse, ‘moral distance’, cosmopolitanism ;
ï‚· Migration, europeanization and European public sphere ;
ï‚· Mobility, labor force and public policy debates ;
ï‚· Migration, diasporic identities, media frames ;
ï‚· Migration and political communication : branding nations, cultural identities, diaspora
policies ;
ï‚· Migration, mobility, new media ;
ï‚· Diasporas, collective memory and history ;
ï‚· Ethnic media and transnational media reporting on diasporas.
Guidelines for authors :
The studies, written either in English or in French, will be sent to the coordinators of the
special issue by 29 February, 2011. Articles will be submitted to blind peer review ;
All contributions will be submitted in electronic Word format (Times New Roman, 12, 1½
lines) ; all graphics or maps will be sent in .jpeg or .tiff format ; tables and figures will be
numbered. References will be given in the text, in brackets (author, year, page). The abstract,
of around 200 words, will be followed by 4-6 key words. Articles should have between
35,000-50,000 characters (with spaces).
Coordinators of the special issue :
Camelia Beciu, National School of Political Studies and Public Administration,
camelia.beciu@gmail.com
Mălina Ciocea, National School of Political Studies and Public Administration,
malina.ciocea@comunicare.ro
Alexandru Cârlan, National School of Political Studies and Public Administration,
alex.carlan@comunicare.ro
The papers will be sent to : alex.carlan@comunicare.ro , malina.ciocea@comunicare.ro ,
with the subject line “Diasporic identities special issue”.
About the Journal
The Romanian Journal of Communication and Public Relations
(http://journalofcommunication.ro) is a an interdisciplinary, academic journal which publishes
scholarly contributions from the broad area of communication studies, from public relations
research, as well as from other related fields. RJCPR is indexed in two international research
databases : EBSCO and ProQuest, and it is included in the B+ category in the ranking system
of the Romanian Council of Higher Education Scientific Research (CNCSIS). All articles
published in the Journal are submitted to blind peer review. The Journal is published by
comunicare.ro Publishing House ( http://www.editura.comunicare.ro ).